Anselm s proof, known since the time of kant as the ontological argument for the existence of god, has played an important role in the history of philosophy and has been incorporated in various forms into the systems of descartes, leibniz, hegel, and others. The second version does not rely on the highly problematic claim that existence is a property and hence avoids many of the objections to the classic version. He offered a further criticism of anselms ontological argument, suggesting that the notion of god cannot be conceived, as anselm had asserted. A contemporary of anselms named gaunilo was an early opponent, who thought the argument would allow us to prove the existence of a perfect.
The paper examines the way in which faith seeking understanding, the ontological argument, and the derivation of the divine. Anselms ontological argument manchester university. A proper understanding and analysis of nature reveals that there is a system that was properly constructed to ensure interdependence and correlation. Anselm wrote his proslogion as a prayer originally, but it later became an argument for god by establishing his attributes. He is best known for the celebrated ontological argument for the existence of god in the proslogion, but his contributions to philosophical theology and indeed to philosophy more generally go well beyond the.
I shall devote special atten tion to one particular ontological argument, the most modest. Anselms argument reconsidered lynne rudder baker and gareth b. The ontological argument for the existence of god is the only a priori argument for gods existence. Compare anselms argument to paleys design argument for gods existence. Proslogion translated by sidney norton deane preface after i had published, at the solicitous entreaties of certain brethren, a brief work the monologion as an example of meditation on the grounds of faith, in the person of one who investigates, in a course of silent reasoning with himself, matters of which he is ignorant.
Anselms proof, known since the time of kant as the ontological argument for the existence of god, has played an important role in the history of philosophy and has been incorporated in various forms into the systems of descartes, leibniz, hegel, and others. Anselm tried to put forward any proofs of the existence of god. On the logic of the ontological argument stanford university. Pdf anselms ontological argument nicole dunn academia. The simple argument in proslogion 2 was reduced to absurdity by anselms fellow benedictine, gaunilo, in a witty reposte entitled liber pro insipiente or on behalf of the fool. Pdf in this article i offer a new interpretation of saint anselms ontological argument. Anselms second version of the ontological argument as it turns out, there are two different versions of the ontological argument in the prosologium. The ontological argument explained the ontological argument for the existence of a monotheistic god was first put forth by st. The argument for idea will cause logic problem with step 5 and step 6. The philosophical consensus seems to be that the argument is hopeless. While there are different versions of the ontological argument, i will here focus on one of the earliest.
More specifically, ontological arguments tend to start with a priori theory about the organization of the universe. Anselm claims that we can prove the existence of god, without any evidence from experience, simply by understanding the conceptof god. About the work although anselms argument for gods existence presented in this article is based on predominately on reason, anselm presents the argument as clari. Evaluate anselms ontological argument for the existence of god. This is my first essay of my first philosophy course. Actually anselm s argument belittles the definition of god, since it cannot be derived from his proof whether god is allpowerful, all knowing, and omnipresent or not. One might put the argument in other words, and argue that god. Anselms ontological argument alleges that god exists is a statement that, if we are thinking clearly and understand the definition of god, we can know to be true.
This is an a prioriargument for the existence of god. Anselm sought out to prove gods existence strictly through reason and rationalism alone. Anselm presents a philosophical argument for the existence of god. Anselms name will forever be associated with the ontological argument for gods existence, which holds that the idea of god in ones mind is evidence of a genuinely existing being. Neal, anselm s ontological argument for the existence of god from grace incarnate 1990 maciej nowicki, anselm and russell logic and logical philosophy 2006 15. In other words, for the adherents of the ontological argument, the existence of a greatest possible being is necessary, and he is god.
Anselm s argument together with gaunilo s, aquinas and kant s objections are conveniently summarized by kenneth einar himma in the internet encyclopedia of philosophy. A deductive argument is valid if true premises guarantee a true conclusion. Anselms ontological argument is certainly one of the most audacious arguments in the history of western philosophy. Anselm begins with a stipulative definition of god as a being than which no greater being can be conceived. The premises of anselms ontological argument were demonstrated to be sound when examined in the context of anselms definition of the greatest conceivable being.
Pdf an argument against descartes ontological argument. Anselm was the archbishop of canterbury who lived from 10331109 a. However, in our opinion, much of this literature ignores or misrepresents the elegant simplicity of the original argument. Anselms ontological argument is an a priori proof of gods existence. Explain anselms ontological argument essay example. Over the centuries, many philosophers have presented criticisms against anselms ontological argument, from gaunilo to descartes and locke to lotze. Speaks january 6, 2006 1 anselms presentation of the argument anselms argument begins with a statement of what god is. Over the centuries, many philosophers have presented criticisms against anselm s ontological argument, from gaunilo to descartes and locke to lotze. He is best known for the celebrated ontological argument for the existence of god in the proslogion, but his contributions to philosophical theology and indeed to philosophy more generally go well beyond the ontological argument. The paper argues that anselms project in the proslogion, is one that anselm himself views as both necessary and paradoxical. An ontological argument attempts to establish the existence of god by deductive reason alone without the inference of any empirical evidence. The one fatal flaw in anselms argument peter millican. The ontological argument from st anselm, proslogium, trans. Now we believe that you are are something than which nothing greater can be thought.
More specifically, ontological arguments tend to start with an a priori theory about the organization of the universe. Anselm, who claims that once we understand the nature of god as a being than which nothing greater can be. One might argue that one of the premises of gaunilos argument is false, whereas the corresponding premise of anselms argument is true. Anselms original argument, in contrast, does link gods spiritual ultimacy his being greatest in terms of goodness with gods ontological ultimacy his be ing greatest in terms of being, and. Anselms actual argument, unlike most versions, is an exercise in intentional logic, a fact that. Ontological argument criticisms introduction to philosophy. Anselm starts with an idea that depends on experience for their justification and then proceeds by purely logical means to the conclusion that god exists. One might argue that gaunilos argument is invalid, whereas anselms is valid. Matthews anselms ontological argument in proslogion 2 has been discussed and criticized so much that it is hard for us today to see its basic structure. In the ontological argument, he constructs a reductio ad absurdum in effort to. He argued that many theists would accept that god, by nature, cannot be fully comprehended.
There is an enormous literature on the material in proslogion iiiii. Anselms ontological argument alleges that god exists is a statement that, if we are thinking clearly and understand the definition of god, we can know to be true a priori. Matthews and lynne rudder baker the ontological argument in anselms proslogion ii continues to generate a remarkable store of sophisticated commentary and criticism. Anselms a prioriargument for the existence of god today we will look at anselms ontological argument for the existence of god. In this paper i argue, against plantinga and others, that kants claim is indeed relevant to anselms argument, in the straightforward sense that if the claim is true, then anselms argument is unsound. My aim is to demonstrate that the significance of this. The ontological argument baggaley 2 look at some of the major arguments for and against the ontological argument. The form of the argument is that of a reductio ad absurdum argument.
Anselms ontological argument for the existence of god anselms argument is an a priori argument. Anselms ontological argument for the existence of god, proceedings of the aristotelian society, volume os3, issue 2, 1 june 1896, pages 2543. For the readers who have not heard this argument, this argument is called an ontological argument, although that label is not anselms it is immanuel kants. Other ontological arguments must be judged on their own merits. Ontological arguments about the existence of god, based in. Many recent authors have interpreted this argument as a modal one. The one fatal flaw in anselms argument 439 gods existence, and another under which it is validand indeed soundbut fails to prove the existence of god. Explain anselms ontological argument essay graduateway. St anselms ontological argument is a deductive, priori, analytic argument which seeks to establish the existence of god by understanding the attributes of god in the sense of classic theism. The core of anselms ontological argument uses a reductio ad absurdum structure to attempt to prove the existence of god. The argument begins with the assertion that god is. Anselms conception of god is that than which nothing greater can be conceived. As weve already noted, god is the being than which no greater can be conceived.
He does this by showing that if the negation of the conclusion is followed then this leads to absurdity a false or nonsensical conclusion. Explain the ontological argument from anselms perspective. The validity of anselms ontological argument anselm expresses his ontological argument of proslogium, chapter ll as follows. The paper argues that anselm s project in the proslogion, is one that anselm himself views as both necessary and paradoxical. We examine the famous ontological argument in proslogium ii.
This is an a priori argument for the existence of god. Ontological arguments stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. The simple argument in proslogion 2 was reduced to absurdity by anselm s fellow benedictine, gaunilo, in a witty reposte entitled liber pro insipiente or on behalf of the fool. As clearly as possible, restate anselms ontological argument.
Theologian and philosopher anselm of canterbury 10331109 proposed an ontological argument in the second and third chapters of his proslogion. Anselm, who claims that once we understand the nature of god as a being than which nothing greater can be conceived, we realize that his essence implies his existence. In the present sense of this term, there are infinitely many ontologi cal arguments, all of them valid. What is common among these versions of ontological argument, including anselms argument for gods existence, is the claim that it is selfcontradictory to deny the existence of a greatest possible being. Saint anselm of canterbury offered several arguments for the existence of god. Anselms ontological argument as a means of seeking understaning in chapters 2 through 4 of the proslogion, anselm submits his ontological argument as a rational proof for the existence of god.
Anselm and of gaunilo, two eleventhcentury thinkers, are both ontological in character. Anselm intended to prove the existence of god, there is disagreement about where the proof is. This is anselms somewhat unwieldy description of god, which i will abbreviate bngc. Moreover, anselms argument was shown to be a valid argument, with a conclusion that follows from the premises. Many arguments fall under the category of the ontological, and they tend to involve arguments about the state of being or existing. This entry is a good place to start for clarification of the above notes to the argument. Saint anselm 10331109 proslogion translated by sidney. Anselms ontological argument for the existence of god. The relevance of kants objection to anselms ontological. Saint anselm of canterbury 10331109 was the outstanding christian philosopher and theologian of the eleventh century. Several philosophers, including descartes 15961650, followed anselm in putting forth a variation of the argument. Ontological arguments about the existence of god, based in premises ostensibly derived.
A criticism of anselms ontological argument leaving. Professor malcolm on anselm s ontological arguments, analysis, 1961. The ontological argument for the existence of god word. Hence, even the fool is convinced that something exists in the understanding, at least, than which nothing greater can be conceived.
Actually anselms argument belittles the definition of god, since it cannot be derived from his proof whether god is allpowerful, all knowing, and omnipresent or not. If by proving the ontological argument false, i do not prove the conclusion false, just the means of reaching the conclusion. Thus, this argument should also be valid against anselm s ontological argument in some aspect. An ontological argument is a philosophical argument for the existence of god that uses ontology.
173 162 349 408 1609 302 243 1668 459 716 935 639 337 1383 317 180 1052 103 1379 1051 1171 1169 104 1410 1294 1181 27 1647 1549 420 1403 1297 675 106 856 110 25 1210 287 472 966 290 426